In the debate about freedom of expression in the wake of the horrible murder in Paris has one and another emerged that has attracted my attention and much has operated on my beaches that has attracted serious questions in my mind. Cross tales are so many people and hot tempers. pork chop recipes Our most talented pens publish articles. Facebook burns. These discussions are wonderful. There is so much that crystallize in those big words, which shall fall. Many shouting war cries, some are wounded. Everything seems to have changed. We have been thrown up in the air and we are disoriented in a turmoil of emotions trying to find a compass that can describe us the way here after. We are all, however, agree that freedom of expression must be protected. Even the rulers of countries pork chop recipes where freedom of expression has been trampled march in Paris to protect freedom of expression. Cross tales are many. People do not agree on whether the cartoonist worlds of Charlie Hebdo was begun to mock ordinary immigrants, with derogatory stereotypes or whether only those have firmly been prepared under the banner of freedom, equality and brotherhood and so fully justified.
In one of the threads that I watched on Facebook Inside threw one of my friends, Jon Olafsson, which I appreciate, that he thought it rather goofy attitude argue that subject and TLB that feeds on stereotypes, prevailing prejudices and such was racist because of the way it uses, and undermines the way ahead, the rhetoric and discourse pork chop recipes patterns or would disgrace the spirit for individuals or groups. In his mind scissors context and purpose of whether such a joke would be racist. pork chop recipes In support of this he cited the words of Jon Gnarr that was asked in the wonderful TV With our eyes whether he felt okay to make fun of people with disabilities. After some hesitation had Jon responded that he felt okay to make fun of disabled people, just like you could make fun of the people that they loved. My Dear Friend Facebook concluded that it would be okay to make fun of disabled people, Muslims, feminists, Plumbers, pork chop recipes hjólreiðamönnum, Jews and so on and so forth. Subject and háðsádeila was inherently pork chop recipes dissident who intends to justice all about how they might express themselves.
This statement swirling up questions in my mind. How could fun of disabled pork chop recipes people classified dissident? Protest against what? Hiding subject pork chop recipes always a justified pork chop recipes act of defiance? Is comedy Jon Gnarrs always justified where it is declared philanthropist and care for people with disabilities? Makes Jon Gnarr just fun to those who care about him? Is it always fun góðlátlegt? Seriously - we evaluate the value of our freedom of expression pork chop recipes in the fact that Jon Gnarr can do infinitely fun of disabled pork chop recipes people?
Now I am not particularly damaged when I made fun of disabled people which adds nothing pork chop recipes to our understanding of the situation while maintaining stereotypes and prejudices. Unfortunately, I experience much of a joke concerning people pork chop recipes with disabilities in a way, ie disabled people pork chop recipes afhelgað and afmennskað jokingly. Disabled people are powerless, marginal placed pork chop recipes minnihutahópur and human rights violations pork chop recipes in the minority every day. People who do not belong to the minority, and it is in the sense of a privileged pork chop recipes group, of course not understand this attitude and feel this joke all right, provided pork chop recipes it bites off their skin. It does not understand that the kind of fun maintains not only stereotypes and prejudices but also separation or "other" with the classification and the others - ie if grínið is repeated over and over without ever learning and awakening of discrimination as it derives from and fosters. Such others pork chop recipes may involve smættun and shame, which justifies pork chop recipes again continuing discrimination and violations of human rights.
This attitude of mine does not mean that I do not support freedom of expression. On the contrary. Jon Gnarr is free to make fun of disabled people - but all freedoms included responsibility. That's right my friend John, the context grins matters ie not just what is said about each, but also who says it and for each and every environment. My position requires that we apply critical thinking while we laugh. It needs to ask the purpose set out. In a very good seminar held by Cultural Studies University on 16 January said Hugleikur Dagsson sometimes be right to say the wrong things pork chop recipes if it is done properly. pork chop recipes I therefore totally agree. But people are free to express themselves however is what is referred pork chop recipes to as being poorly. And not all good fun. And not everything is fun satire, what the dissident.
In this regard, I was thinking that a few years ago was reissued old book that went offend many. This was the book Ten small negrastrákar, a book with pictures of the artist Muggur, which appeared on the surface so innocent. Perhaps it was so that some were nostalgic dream to cuddle under a blanket pork chop recipes with his children and laughing cozy together the misfortune of
No comments:
Post a Comment